The Usanga Wetlands in Tanzania

The country Tanzania, seated in East Africa is frequently known to Europeans and Americans as the place to spot the Big Five! However, few recognise the complexities of the Tanzanian climate, perceiving it solely for its commercial value within the tourist industry.

The image typically associated with Tanzania - beautiful scenery. 

Often overlooked and discouraged, wetlands provide valuable contributions to human life. This is particularly evident in Tanzania, where although they make up less than 10% of the land, their presence helps sustain 95% of the country’s wildlife and livestock.  The wetlands of the Usangu Plains, situated in the headwaters of the Great Ruaha River are the most valuable freshwater resource for Tanzania. 

However, the ecosystem is particularly susceptible to climate variations and primarily used for irrigation of agriculture, causing heavy water abstraction. This has resulted in falling ground water tables, dried up connecting tributaries and polluted waterways. The question now is how can the Usangu wetland be maintained as a key water source for the agricultural industry and also be protected against overuse and anthropogenic climate change.


The International Convention of Wetlands (Ramsar Convention), encourages sustainable utilisation of wetlands on a local scale, recognising the benefits they have as a water resource. Conversely, the discourse on how to protect and maintain their use in an effective fashion can be muddling. 

So far, it has been argued that for the case of wetlands in Africa, there is merely not enough data to effectively understand these habitats, hindering the options to implement successful management systems in areas where water is already scarce. In saying this, in the early 2000s, notably around the time the Green Revolution was rising across African countries, research was conducted into why the rivers connecting the Usangu wetland were drying up earlier than usual. This was estimated to be due to the mass irrigation and abstractions taking place. Since the 1970s, there has been rapid expansions in the irrigated area of the wetland, increasing from around 10,000 ha to 44,000 ha in just over 30 years. Notably, this correlates with an increasing population, with human activities altering the natural flow and equilibrium of the wetland.


Graph of population growth in Tanzania since the 1960s

Population data in millions, displaying rapid population growth from the World Data

To try and combat the rapidly reducing water levels, various Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) projects have been implemented, including action from the Department of International Development (DFID) via the “Sustainable Management of the Usangu Wetland and its Catchment” (SMUWC). 

In essence, this was a top-down funded project to assess the wetlands and their catchments, decide the rights of who should utilise the wetland resources all whilst trying to increase local involvement. The conclusion was that the three main state farms would drastically reduce their water usage during the dry season and distribute remaining water for domestic use and to small farms. 

However, the top-down scheme meant policy uptake was not effectively implemented and the challenge to protect and maintain the wetland persists. There are various management strategies implemented across the length of the Great Ruaha River, attempting to manage contesting needs including balancing the tourist industry, intensive farming and local wellbeing. Policy making and deciding who gets what is particularly challenging with the clear interconnected relationship between food and politics at play here.

Overall, the issue remains that the Usangu wetland is drying up quicker and earlier in the season than previous, creating issues for those living downstream and the farming industry who rely on the freshwater resource. It has been suggested that to maintain the absolute minimum desired flows downstream in the East Wetland, a 65% reduction in abstraction from perennial rivers during the dry season would need to occur. Therefore, it is essential to improve water efficiency and manage the water amongst competing users. Whether this be by reducing water diversions at the start of the dry season (June) in hope to maintain wetland storage so they last through the entire period or increase groundwater storage via boreholes for domestic use, effective plans need to be put in place for the Usanga to survive.


Image of the Ruaha National Park where the regions of the Usanga Wetlands can be found. Image demonstrating how wildlife is also reliant on the tributaries and areas of wetland. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is virtual water the problem solver for Kenya?

Image
Kenya has a population of just under 55 million people, however over 43% of those do not have access to fresh, clean water on a daily basis. Unsurprisingly, the lack of water has also reduced the opportunity to grow sustainable crops, and with the agricultural industry providing around one third of the nation’s income , eruptions of violence have occurred as pressure increases to sustain the country’s population. The water crisis in Kenya does not just impact the agricultural industry, access to clean water is also a major concern, particularly for maternal care. Unfortunately, the Kakamega Provincial District General Hospital has been forced to provide its patients with polluted buckets of water, causing an increase in typhoid and diphtheria, exposing how the water crisis impacts all. Kenya’s story of water insecurity becomes even more complicated when one considers how more than 80% of the region is arid or semi-arid, with a mere 17% of the country considered to have high agricu
Read more

Introduction to Water and Food - The complexity of Africa

Image
  Water and food - two inextricably linked concepts which arguably define human existence. Unfortunately, when seating these two notions within the continent of Africa, generalisation and stereotypes typically bound the discussions. After reading the article by Wainaina (one must not ignore how satirical the piece is, and one may suggest that academic writing regarding African cultures and experiences has improved within the last 15 years, although a lot of work must continue to be done) I became aware of and confronted subconscious thoughts regarding my personal approach to writing about African countries and the attitude taken by other writers. Wainaina suggests how mainstream, Western media has perpetually fed readers a generalised meaning to African life, grouping countries together and a continuously reinforcing the theme of how the West urgently needs to help the African continent. This is particularly apparent within the discourse of water and food, so I will be cautious not to
Read more

Zimbabwe’s volatile relationship with food security

Image
The discussion of Zimbabwe’s food security is extensive and historically complex, with the nation suffering years of explosive political discrepancies. To gather a holistic understanding of Zimbabwe’s food security, it is crucial to recognise the legacy of colonialism and political instability this created. The radical redistribution of land began in the early1980s via the implementation of the Lancaster Agreement and called an end to the Rhodesian Bush War. The theory behind the land distribution stemmed from years of inequality between white and black farmers in Zimbabwe, with the goal to reorganise the land equally amongst farmers and transfer land ownership back to the majority blacks . However, unsurprisingly, this was not a simple process and unfortunately lead to years of corrupt government control and an intensification of farming on malnourished land, generating a decrease in crop yields. Land reform strategies ranged from market-based including the ‘willing seller-willing b
Read more